The Rich Get Richer

So we had this bill in the legislature, 2893.

It lifted the levy lid, what school districts can raise themselves, from 24% to 28%.

It also lifted the levy equalization percentage, which benefits property-poor school districts, from 12% to 14%.

It was also written in such a way that if the increase in levy equalization wasn't funded, then the increase in the levy lid wouldn't be valid either.

Governor Gregoire used a line-item veto to take that away.

Now levy equalization for property-poor districts is being threatened with a 3% to 5% cut for the coming school year.

Property-rich districts, though, will still be able to ask voters for more and more levy dollars, while property-poor districts watch the one lifeline they have get frayed away.

There are two Americas. It's hard to tell that Governor Gregoire really gives a damn about the one I'm in.

Even beyond basic school levies, though, are programs like the Families and Education Levy in Seattle and the proposed Children's Investment Fund in Spokane where the levies are run through the city instead of the schools, meaning millions of extra dollars for programs for kids. I don't begrudge them their success, but see the title of this post.

More from KPLU here and the Everett Herald here.

Read more here, if any.

Washington Education Week #8: More News That's Bad News Edition

We've just about reached the halfway point of the legislative session, and it's shaping up to be a beaut. I've got $5 that says they don't finish on time; any takers?

---

Item #1: The Tax Man Co....you know what, that's been done. Wednesday's vote to suspend I-960 made for some great viewing on TV Washington this morning as Ross Hunter's House Finance Committee took it up. On one side the Taxed Enough Already believers; on the other, an alliance of social service advocates.

As the always excellent Bill Lyne of Western Washington University points out, though, talking about how to raise taxes revenue is pretty meaningless until they get the votes together to do it, and I'm not sure how long it will take them to get there.

Or consider my favorite issue, levy equalization. Everyone agrees that LEA is important and we need to keep that lifeline available for property-poor school districts, but with the budget deficit ballooning to $2.8 billion dollars you would either have to cut $142 million dollars from somewhere else to save LEA, or you have to come up with that much more revenue, particularly if they do raise the levy lid (see below).

In short, even if they do suspend I-960 and get more income coming in, there are still going to be cuts, and they could be pretty terrible for the schools. Speaking as a union president who lost 5 jobs last year, I'm terrified of what the future could bring. Calculated Risk says that there could still be a layoff crisis coming in the states; will Washington teachers be a part of that?

(Aside: over at Sound Politics, Stefan Sharkansky blames part of the deficit on teacher union contracts, because apparently the budget office didn't understand how exactly layoffs work. #1, that says a lot about the stupidity of the people who put the budget together if they don't understand who gets laid off. #2, any time you brush even remotely close to an argument for laying off the most highly paid teachers first, union guys like me win. I'm looking at you, Marguerite Roza.)

(Aside #2: Threatening to kill your legislators isn't a really effective way to make your point.)

---

Item #2: On the other hand, the People seem to be OK with school taxes. It was a great day for levies statewide on Tuesday. My own district passed a $17 million dollar bond measure which will allow us to add on to two buildings and close down a third, and that was the story all over. More from the Senate Democrats here and the League of Education Voters here.

The simple majority made a difference, as the LEV points out. 66 levy issues passed with between 50% and 60% yes, including 49 of the all-important M&O levies. More from the Washington Education Association, including a wider look at the revenue picture, here and Goldy at Horse's Ass here.

I also note that Kent passed two different levies, which is important given that they had a painful strike this past fall. Bellevue, who had their significant troubles in the fall of 2008, passed their levy with a 66% yes vote. For all the talk about strikes turning communities against teachers, it hasn't played out in these two cases. Battle Ground passed their levy as well; they were talking about financial insolvency if they didn't.

---

Item #3: What are liberal and democratic values, anyhow? A passel of legislators came out at the end of the week and proposed an increase in the sales tax to help the budget deficit. The Washington Budget and Policy Center says that it could save jobs; the EFF says that it will increase unemployment.

The struggle I'm having is this: in 2003, it was said that Washington State has the absolute most regressive tax system in the country. This was echoed just last November and during the debate on I-1033. While I certainly don't want to see these cuts to eldercare, children's health, and public education, taking the money to save those programs out of the hides of those who can least afford it feels like terrible, terrible public policy, especially when you take the unemployment rates into consideration as well.

If we, by which I mean progressives, are trading on our values for 30 pieces of silver, then we've already lost the discussion.

---

Item #4: Putting the Equality back in Levy Equalization. Levy Equalization has the profile that it does here in Washington primarily thanks to the work of one man: Neal Kirby, a former legislator from the 7th who now serves as a school principal in Centralia. If you've read an article about levy equalization, it's probably from Neal Kirby. If you've gotten an email about levy equalization, it's probably from Neal Kirby. He's one of the most gifted and passionate organizers you're ever going to find on any issue, and those of us in property-poor school districts all owe him a debt of gratitude.

That said, HB2893 is a divisive piece of legislation. It raises the levy lid from 24% to 28%, while at the same time raising the state's percentage of levy equalization from 12% to 14%. In Neal's reasoning that only widens the disparity between rich and poor districts, and he's absolutely correct. Here in my portion of Eastern Washington only 7 out of 60 area districts would benefit from the lid lift, but they would benefit to the tune of millions upon millions of dollars, and that's an awfully hard thing to walk away from.

What's interesting is that, while there were members of the House who voted against the bill because of the equity issue, none of them offered amendments to fix that problem. That seems odd. Further, there is a fiscal note attached to the bill--it'll cost another $26 million in this bienium--and while that seems small given the $2.8 billion dollar hole we're facing, it's not chump change either.

This is perhaps the most important fight of this legislative session, especially given how many school districts are already on the financial brink. More from the PSE of Washington here and the Seattle PI here.

---

Item #5: Judge Doran Erlick says that the state is underfunding education; the state says, "Yes, we know" and carries on unabated. Long ago, on February 4th, King County Superior Court Judge John Erlick looked at all the accumulated evidence, analyzed where the state says that the schools need to be, and said, "Well, duh, you're obviously underfunding education."

Senate Majority Leader Lisa Brown (D-Spokane) popped up on TV Washington the night of the decision, and after they got her a booster seat she stared down Austin Jenkins and said, "Yep, the schools are underfunded!" A bunch of other legislators (notably, Ross Hunter and Skip Priest) issued statements saying, "Good Golly, we sure are verklempt about all that underfunding!" Everyone seems to agree, sure enough, that the schools are underfunded.

But, as Goldy points out, whinging without working isn't going to do anything to solve the problem we're looking at. Austin Jenkins makes much the same point over at Crosscut. Randy Dorn, who is an ineffectual idiot, can stand tall and yell to the heavens that this is a landmark decision, but when OSPI is pissing away hundreds of thousands of dollars on consultants and unproven programs, he doesn't have any sort of moral authority on the issue.

The Northwest Education Law Center here, The Advance here, The League of "Education" Voters here and here, and a useful Google search here.

(Aside: It feels like Governor Gregoire is backing next Governor Rob McKenna into a bit of a corner here; if he doesn't appeal the decision he's got the state on the hook for hundreds of millions of dollars in new spending, which isn't exactly going to play well to his base. If he does appeal the decision, he loses a lot of his credibility as a centrist. Could be a fun dynamic to watch.)

---

Bits and pieces:

• I laughed. Then, I laughed again.
  
  
• Watching the State Senate when Sen. Rosa Franklin is serving as President Pro Tem is mind-numbing.
  
  
• Music teachers are meeting in Yakima this weekend, and they're not too concerned with the state budget according to the article. Also in Yakima, they're closing the School for the Arts. Just sayin'.
  
  
• I don't know much about Maria Goodloe-Johnson as a superintendent, but I do know that she's got to be one of the most politically tone deaf people in the business today.
  
  
• Mike Antonucci hates school consolidation.

Read more here, if any.

I Know I'm Getting Into the Deep Weeds Here....

....but what do I care if the levy lid rate goes up, but the levy equalization rate does not? Equality is nice and all, but I'm a lot less worried right now about the rich getting richer than I am about trying to make sure that the poor at least maintain what they have.

Read more here, if any.

WeWee #5: Chris Gregoire Ate My Baby

One big story this week with 100 different facets to it.

#1) The Governor's Budget: As required by law, Governor Gregoire released a balanced budget that really takes the piss out of a ton of sacred cows. General Assistance Unemployable? Gone. The state's Basic Health plan? Eliminated. 3 year olds in ECEAP pre-school? Not any more.

In the K-12 realm specifically, we're looking at the elimination of levy equalization ($142.9 million), the K-4 class size reduction money ($110.6 million), all-day kindergarten ($33.6 million), the Student Achievement Program ($78.5 million), gifted ed funding ($7.4 million), as well as a bunch of the categorical programs I listed here.

I'm having a hard time with this. On one hand, the state revenue forecasts don't lie--we're well below the projections that were set, and that hole has to be closed. On the other, there are still pieces in this budget that are impossible to justify given the hole that we're looking at, and frankly it makes her oft-repeated statement of "We've looked at everything with three zeroes" nothing more than the usual political bloviating.

Do I think this was a hard budget to put together? Absolutely. I refuse to grant, though, that this is the absolute best work she can do, because if this is all that Governor Gregoire and our leadership have, I've made some pretty horrible voting mistakes these past few elections.

#2) But There's Taxes Hope on the Horizon: At the same time she was releasing her budget Governor Gregoire was also saying that she'd be releasing a different budget next month that could bring in more state revenue. This could include closing tax loopholes (Dot Foods comes to mind), ending the sales tax exemption for folks from states like Oregon that don't have the sales tax, and a potential $1 billion plus in taxes from things like securities, detective work, and data processing. The first things to come back, should the money come in? Levy equalization, all-day kindergarten, and the basic health plan.

The response was predictable, with Republicans like Sen. Joe Zarelli and Rep. Gary Alexander blasting the budget as a charade to justify more tax increases, while Democrats like Lisa Brown bemoaned the general situation and said they looked forward to seeing what the Governor proposed come January.

(But not an income tax)

Given the way things are going, it wouldn't shock if the deficit by then was $3 billion.

#3) You Can Blame All of This On Eugene Debs and Joe Hill: There was a good write-up in the Spokesman-Review on how Spokane County officials are pushing for concessions from their union contracts in order to avoid laying off 150 workers. In a similar vein you've got the Fordham Foundation urging Arne Duncan to be more aggressive about challening teachers unions on Race to the Top, and the usual from Mike Antonucci sharing the books that make up his spank bank.

I had a meeting with my staff on Friday morning to talk about the Governor's budget. My district could be on the hook for about $1.5 million in cuts if nothing changes; that's about 8% of our budget. The guidance I need from them is pretty simple: jobs, or money? I can protect salaries as per the contract, but that'll mean a lot of our members are pushed out the door. I can save jobs, but it'll be at the cost of per diem money, supplies reimbursements, and other pieces that I've talked about here and here.

I'm a proud union guy because I've seen the difference that collective action can make, and I make absolutely no apologies for that fact. At the end of the day, though, there's always going to be that tension between the needs of the individual against the needs of the body, and it's finding that balance that is the absolute hardest challenge in my work.

#4) And Moses Walked Through the Palouse and Said, "Lo, Let There Be LEA": Goldy over at Horse's Ass points out that the money that funds levy equalization tends to come from property-rich districts that happily vote for taxes (Seattle, Bellevue, Mercer Island) and goes to support school districts in some of the most conservative bailiwicks in the state, notably around Spokane, the Tri-Cities, and Vancouver.

It bugs me that levy equalization could be political--those districts need that money, sometimes quite desparately--but (and this is a point I've been trying to get across in my WEAPAC work) school funding is based off the state, and it all comes to us through a political process. I'm working with a lot of my small school districts even now on how to get the right things said to the right legislators, and it's quite an adventure.

#5) Well, That Could Be Interesting: Part of the Governor's budget plan is to close the juvenile facilities at Green Hill in Chehalis and Maple Lane in Rochester; I had just mentioned them two weeks back. I'm curious to talk to their local presidents, because what do you do with the union members when the state closes the school? It could be an early preview of what will happen with the State Board of Education school reform plan.

---

Bits and pieces:

• It's not looking good for job hunters in the Yakima area. On a 1-to-10 scale of surprise, this rates a negative 7.
  
• The EFF has an idea on how the state can save a little scratch. They've clearly picked sides in the War on Christmas, and I'm telling.
  
• It really isn't funny, but a headline like Drug Counselor Arrested for Dealing Drugs does lend itself to some humorous quips, no?
  
• This made me genuinely and sincerely happy as a kid at Christmas. Similarly, this video sums up several hundred hours of my childhood in one easy package.
  
• Pretty interesting thread over at Sound Politics on new legislation from Cathy McMorris-Rogers that would ban certain kinds of restraints used on students. This came up in our own legislature not too long ago, and I'll stick by my same principle: you shouldn't substitute the judgment of an OSPI or DoEd bureaucrat for that of the teacher in the classroom. Not on this, anyhow.

I'm traveling for Christmas next week, so no Washington Education Week until the new year. Wishing you all a very Merry Christmas and a wonderful 2010!

Read more here, if any.

Chatter

Talked to a couple of principals on Friday who attended the AWSP conference down in Yakima last week. Apparently a couple of State Senators were there who said that they fully expect the budget deficit they have to deal with to roll right past $2 billion dollars and settle--maybe--at right around $2.25 billion.

So long, levy equalization.
Nice to have known you, K-4 class size enhancement.
Hey, full day kindergarten! We had a good coupla years, didn't we?
I-728? You've been mostly dead, so let's just make it official.

There is no hope.

Read more here, if any.

No on I-1033 Week: Because Tim Eyman Doesn't Understand Levy Law

It's worth reading this interview with Tim Eyman on the TV Washington website, because he's a moron:

Let’s say you put it to voters to raise sales tax by $1 billion a year and use that for education. If voters vote for that, the billion a year would be exempt for all time from the formula for determining growth.

Now nevermind that we've just cut $2 billion dollars from education and are in line to cut hundreds of millions of dollars more. The trouble comes from the fact that local school districts have a lid on the amount of money that they can ask for from levies (24%), and can't ask for money above that. Consider, too, that there are many school districts that could never ask for the full 24% because of their property-poor nature (see the tag below for levy equalization), so they'll never have a real chance at success.

Tim doesn't care what this will do to our schools. Hopefully, the voters will.

Read more here, if any.

Today's Education Hero: Rep. Joel Kretz of the 7th LD

Rep. Kretz is a Republican who represents the 7th LD, which covers everything north of Spokane to the Canadian border, and from Idaho to the Okanogan Valley. Geographically the largest in Washington, it's also a district where any cuts to levy equalization (LEA) would be the most profoundly felt, and Rep. Kretz has been leading the charge to preserve this vital funding for small school districts.

As exhibit 1, check out his 2009 session newsletter (which I hope to be able to link to shortly). Fully half of it is devoted to HB1776 and levy equalization, including a list of every school district he represents and what the Governor's proposed cuts to LEA would have meant for them.

Exhibit 2, this editorial published in the Pend O'Reille Miner on levy equalization, which gets to the heart of the issue in as clear and succinct a way as you're ever going to find. It was also published in the Davenport Times, which is where I first encountered it.

If there is a special session in October where levy equalization is attacked, again, it's good to know that we have people like Joel Kretz fighting the good fight.

Read more here, if any.

Senator Eric Oemig: Small School Districts are PARASITES!

Last week the annual WASA/AWSP Conference was here in Spokane, and since I'm still an intern member I headed down to learn some more, check out the exhibits, and see what was shaking.

In the afternoon there was a legislative town hall meeting about education, which was both an unexpected surprise and right up my alley. From the Senate came Curtis King, K-12 Education chair Rosemary McAuliffe, and vice-chair Eric Oemig. The House was represented by their education chair, Dave Quall, and committee member Tim Probst.

The first 20 minute or so were nothing special. Rep. Quall gave shout-outs to some friends in the audience, Senator McAuliffe talked about.....stuff. I struggle with the good Senator sometimes, but such is life.

It's about 23 minutes in that things got interesting, when a question came from the audience about levy equalization (LEA) and how important it is for small school districts. Senator King (who is out of the Yakima area, mind you, so he knows his small schools), offers that he's glad that bill died, while Rep. Probst says that saving LEA was almost "an accident" of the legislative process and talks about the importance of skills centers and career education.

Then there's Senator Oemig:

"I want to take a stab at this LEA question, too, just because I'm a money numbers guy, I'm a fiscal conservative. And there's a lot of energy around that issue. And I was just talking to my school board, and they were talking about how this is so important, levy equalization. Not because they receive any--they don't. This subsidy goes out to smaller districts. And the problem that I see is that we see large districts that are subsidizing small districts advocating for that equity.

"But we're not seeing a symbiotic relationship. It's actually kind of parasitic."

"I don't hear small districts saying hey, raise those levies in those larger districts where they're able to collect the money. We've got to figure out how to solve the funding of education and get revenue where it can be gotten."

"I think we've got to equalize, then, that money statewide. And there's nobody that I've met in the legislature that doesn't think levy equalization is important. But we have to understand the dual role that we see with levies in the districts that are raising them--we have to let them raise those, and we have to equalize them."

"I really want you to think about that after this--that's something that I want you to take away from here."

Being in the room I can tell you his comments caused quite a bit of tut-tutting; the first speaker after him pointed out that levy equalization isn't about big and small, it's about rich and poor--that's why Spokane and Evergreen of Vancouver, two of the largest districts in the state, are also two power-consumers of LEA dollars.

The heart of Senator Oemig's strawman argument, though, is that small school districts aren't advocating hard enough for large school districts, and that's an argument that sort of beggars imagination. The reason people on my side of the state were so against HB1776 was because of the cut to levy equalization--it had nothing at all to do with the fact that it also would have raised the levy lid for affluent school districts. If they get more money, good for them--just leave my damn budget alone.

Remember, too, that back in April Senator McAuliffe was defending LEA cuts because she felt that the stimulus money coming in was an equitable replacement.

It's going to be a big issue in the coming session. If you're in a district that receives LEA money, start prepping NOW. A parent or a teacher? Start talking to your school board and central office admins about the State School Directors Association Legislative Conference in September. WEA members, talk with your Uniserv leadership and your WEA board members and let them know what you think. Legislative Assembly Days are in Olympia in October, and that'll be a good chance to talk with your Representatives about this issue, or any other.

Man the ramparts, folks. It's needed.

Read more here, if any.

Gregoire's Education Budget: Levy Equalization

(First in a series of serious looks at the education section of Governor Gregoire's budget, which means I have to drop the l33t speak and put away the lolgregoire pictures I made. Damn.)

A couple of weeks ago I posted about Local Effort Assistance (LEA), also known as Levy Equalization--the money that the state gives to those districts with lots of non-taxable land (state parks, prisons, etc.) to make up for the lost levy money. The thrust of that post was that cutting LEA works politically because so much more of it goes to Eastern Washington school districts, making it easy for your political power base to make the cut--Seattle doesn't get any LEA money, so what does Frank Chopp (Speaker of the House, out of Seattle) care? The Governor ordered a 4% reduction to LEA for this biennium to make up for the hole that has appeared, and in her budget proposal that cut's going to get deeper:

Reduction in levy equalization, which provides a state match to local school districts with higher-than average tax rates to raise a local levy (those districts are more “property poor” than average). For calendar years 2010 and 2011, allocations for levy equalization are reduced by 33 percent. This timing allows school districts to phase in the reductions over two school years. ($125.4 million GF-S)

Putting it off helps slightly, maybe, I guess, but I tinkered with the spreadsheet to see how much money that could cost Washington districts, and it ain't pretty:

• Spokane: $3,998,849
  
• Yakima: $3,357,764
  
• Pasco: $2,535,265
  
• Kennewick: $2,342,471
  
• Evergreen: $2,193,321

The figure that I've used recently for the average cost of a teacher is $80,000; in real money, then, that's about 50 teachers in Spokane. For a district like mine ($442,000), it's about 4.5 positions out of 130 positions.

Now there's a lot of legitimate objections to be had here. #1 might be wondering why a decidedly urban district like Spokane is getting any LEA money. One would suppose, too, that Senate Majority Leader Lisa Brown out of Spokane's 3rd LD would have something to say about a cut that could really hurt her home district. You could also offer that these cuts don't necessarily need to be staff cuts, as there are also other areas of the budget beyond salaries.
All well and good. My overarching concern, though, is that this isn't a cut that effects everyone equally. If you cut the class-size reduction money (that's the next post) you're at least being equitable; going after LEA, which was put in place to remedy a systemic injustice, just creates a different problem.

Watch to see what the legislature does with this, because it could be a hell of an albatross.

Read more here, if any.