Meanwhile, in Tacoma....
....they're having a nice, big argument about whether the superintendent's job review should have been made open to the public. In reading the articles it seems like a case of the News Tribune making a story because they need something to do, but you be the judge:
The newspaper's point is that since a good evaluation adds a year to his contract then this needs to be done in a public manner. To me, if it's all over the newspapers then it has been done in a public manner. C'est la vis.
Update: Added the last link. (3/23)
- Tacoma Superintendent "Satisfactory"
- Should Board Have Opened Job Review?
- Nothing "Satisfactory" About Rushed Evaluation
- Too Hasty on Tacoma Superintendent Review?
The newspaper's point is that since a good evaluation adds a year to his contract then this needs to be done in a public manner. To me, if it's all over the newspapers then it has been done in a public manner. C'est la vis.
Update: Added the last link. (3/23)
Labels: public meeting, superintendent, Tacoma
posted by Ryan at 7:10 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home