Congratulations to Senator Rodney Tom on Breaking the World Record Time for Shitting the Bed After Taking Power
I'm not even talking about all the nonsense with Pam Roach, although that is a fun side story that gives the press corp something to do in this week where every committee meeting begins with 30 minutes of "I'm Representative Jones, I love kids, and my district is awesome!"
Remember last month, when the Majority Coalition Caucus came into being in the Washington State Senate and released their five governing principles?
We, the members of the Coalition Caucus, come together behind the principles of:
In return Senator Tom, who worries about the middle class in the same way that a hawk worries about the number of mice in a field, calls GET a Ponzi scheme (horseshit--the money is always there for those who pay into it) and tries to argue that GET is somehow driving tuition costs when it's the legislature and the directives that they've given to the colleges that's making that happen, not GET. Senator Tom is the former chair of the Senate Higher Education Committee--he knows full well why tuition has become what it has become. I mean, really:
Tom said it's unclear exactly who the GET program helps.
It's clear as day, unless you really don't want to see. It helps middle class families, like mine. Someone who literally lives off of a trust fund may not get that, but our reality is different than his. It is heartening to see that the House Republicans, most notably Gary Alexander, have already come out against eliminating GET, and I applaud them for it.
It only took five days, out of 105 in the session, for Senator Tom to have his first several screw-ups. Here's to more of the same next week.
Other reading:
Remember last month, when the Majority Coalition Caucus came into being in the Washington State Senate and released their five governing principles?
We, the members of the Coalition Caucus, come together behind the principles of:
- budget sustainability and living within our means;
- creating an economic environment where jobs are plentiful and small businesses thrive;
- providing a world-class education system through reforms and enhancements;
- governing collaboratively to protect our most vulnerable while prioritizing the needs of middle-class Washingtonians;
- and setting priorities for state government and holding it accountable.
In return Senator Tom, who worries about the middle class in the same way that a hawk worries about the number of mice in a field, calls GET a Ponzi scheme (horseshit--the money is always there for those who pay into it) and tries to argue that GET is somehow driving tuition costs when it's the legislature and the directives that they've given to the colleges that's making that happen, not GET. Senator Tom is the former chair of the Senate Higher Education Committee--he knows full well why tuition has become what it has become. I mean, really:
Tom said it's unclear exactly who the GET program helps.
It's clear as day, unless you really don't want to see. It helps middle class families, like mine. Someone who literally lives off of a trust fund may not get that, but our reality is different than his. It is heartening to see that the House Republicans, most notably Gary Alexander, have already come out against eliminating GET, and I applaud them for it.
It only took five days, out of 105 in the session, for Senator Tom to have his first several screw-ups. Here's to more of the same next week.
Other reading:
- Senator Rodney Tom: The Politics of Two-Faced Divisiveness by Joel Connelly at the Seattle PI
- Senator Rodney Tom: Give College Savings Program the Budget Ax by John Stang at Crosscut
- Axing College Savings Program: The Jury Is Out, ibid
- Money From Nothing?, by the only media outlet in the state that would praise Senator Tom for this.
Labels: colleges, Gary Alexander, Guaranteed Education Tuition, Legislative Session 2013, Rodney Tom, tuition
1 Comments:
"I'm Representative Jones, I love kids, and my district is awesome!"
Hilarious because it is true!
On GET: I've been watching it with some concern for years. While not technically a ponzi scheme, it differs only because the state taxpayer guarantees the payout.
Otherwise, the study shows that future investors are necessary to keep it solvent in the near term (and likely in the long term too).
I can see the sense of shutting it down soon if it is going to become a growing liability on the state's books.
Post a Comment
<< Home